If it is a work of art, then no. There is no reason to destroy the truth or beauty, and the artwork doesn't have to be beautiful in the sense of an Impressionist painting. I once reviewed a show involving a piece that was an angry black painting (not racial), and I condemned it, then realized that it drew me through a process of thought that proved it reflected the times, and there I was, realizing that art is often the conversation it evokes. It contains meaning. Meaning should never be destroyed. Things representing us as persons, our experiences, what we think about, and what touches us cathartically are deemed valuable. There are, however, a few estate sale paintings that I will avoid no matter what screams up from them as to the improvisation of art. And even the most detailed image in a room can be the thing that makes it all work. One may never know the future of what may be valuable. Great art always elevates us or a place where all the mundane elements of a room or a person are unrealized.