I said: “The failure of sex robots relates to the fact that we are garnering love from an inanimate object, where who loves us validates us. A robot makes a mockery of us. We need a fellow human being to love and be loved by. Porn, for example, is unstable for that reason. You are ultimately alone, unloved, a mere observer, at best. A sex robot relegates you to disposable. Only an object with no feelings could love you. That’s suicidal.”

Moree, the key here is “who loves us validates us.” The issue is not being “live,” but being true. Even ‘cam to cam,’ where you ‘bond’ and ‘interact with a TOTAL STRANGER from anywhere in the world’ because of ‘CONSENT’ to share nakedness and disconnected sexual play is further distanced by the fact that you have to ‘PAY’ to engage should be an indication for you that my initial point of ultimately being alone, unloved, a mere observer, at best, makes you disposable, a member in a long line of onlookers and players, and as an object stand.

Thus, you are clearly unfamiliar with “the failure of sex robots…”